By 1964, millions of Republicans (and a bunch of Democrats) had read Goldwater's book, The Conscience of a Conservative. It pretty much laid out his whole political agenda and the reasons behind it. So by the time the Cow Palace filled up with GOPers on that day in July, most in attendance were familiar with what the Senator was all about.
If Barry G's book was a concert, this speech was like the encore performance. All of his biggest fans were there, cheering him on as he performed the song they'd all been waiting to hear. For the rest of us who weren't at the convention, maybe haven't read the book, and weren't even alive in 1964, here's a quick overview:
The whole purpose of government is to maximize individual freedom while still maintaining order. According to Barry, each member of the human species is a unique and special snowflake. The economic and spiritual parts of our snowflake selves are inextricably intertwined, and one part can't be free unless both parts are free. Furthermore, every person is responsible for their own development into their best self; the outside world can't do it for us.
That sounds great and all, but what does it look like in practice?
Well, says the Senator, it looks like a government that stays as far out of people's personal lives as possible, because government intervention never except never actually solves social problems. It looks like a national defense system that is strong enough to (a) make sure no one (like evil communists) messes with we Americans while we're getting our freedom on, and (b) help other countries make sure no one (like evil communists) keeps them from getting their freedom on too.
Whether we know Barry's lyrics by heart or we're a first-time listener, this speech definitely gives us a pretty good idea of what his brand of conservatism is all about.
Fun fact: A month after BGs speech, the Beatles performed at the Cow Palace. Personally, we think that performance would've been way more fun.
Questions About Philosophical Viewpoints: Republicanism
- Barry's notions of 'divine will' and 'God-given freedom' are very similar to the United Nations' description of human rights. Should Barry just have said 'human rights' and ditched the religious references? Why or why not?
- How can different definitions of equality lead to freedom on one hand and conformism on the other?
- Do you agree with Barry that "only the strong can keep the peace" (56)?
- Do you think that government is more effective at the local level or the national level? Why? Would Goldwater agree with you?
Chew on This
Goldwater's Republicanism sounds awful; people need guidance and support from the government to help them truly reach their potential.
Goldwater's right; we don't need politicians in Washington telling us how to live our lives.